That latter group includes Freedom Scientific's WYNN 4 and Kurzweil 3000, and those will be the topic of the next blog. This one is devoted to what I might call the "UDL class," although the first one here comes very, very close to crossing over between categories.
First though, I need to address a huge issue in this area of Assistive Technology. This is the negative impact of the "solutions" from Premier Assistive Technology. All through the conference I've heard complaints about how this is being "sold" (almost given away) to schools. How it simply doesn't work. How it both gives AT and digital literacy support a bad name while giving school administrators an excuse to not really make their schools accessible. Students report that it does not work. Teachers report incredible frustration. Trainers report that it is often hard to get teachers or students to try anything else after struggling with it. Steve Timmer, who founded Premier, is a nice guy, but he is doing some real damage to this field.


A really nice feature is the ability of the teacher to create "user groups" with specific features (supports) in use or not. There is also - as in WYNN and Kurzweil - the ability to convert the text directly into mp3 files (or other audio formats) and transfer this directly to CD or iPod. And there's a unique thesaurus structure called Word Finder. I could really see this applied to every computer in a school, and open to every student - without diagnosis. It is a set of solutions that perhaps 70% - 80% of students would find useful at one point or another. Read-and-Write Gold is a UK invention (from near Belfast), and has achieved a great deal of acceptance in Europe, from primary through university. In the U.S., Kentucky has chosen it as their primary state literacy support and testing solution.
Another low training solution is Plustek Book Reader. Plustek isn't a "total" solution - it has none

Then there is ClaroRead. ClaroRead, ClaroConcepts, and WordRead are all elegant text-to-speech solutions, but they lack the kind of word and sentence highlighting that helps

None of this is to suggest that Microsoft Reader and Firefox FoxyVoice (or the more complex FireVox) should not also be on every computer in your school. They are 100% free, and not having them really means that your school isn't trying.
As promised, I'll look at WYNN and Kurzweil, and how they are being used in "best practices" as soon as I can.
from Los Angeles where the beach - at Manhattan Beach - was just lovely today... Ira Socol
1 comment:
Thank you so much for all the product updates from CSUN. I am interested in your comment that ClaroRead and WordRead "lack the kind of word and sentence highlighting that helps students learn"
I would love to know if there has been any research carried out to show that different ways of highlighting text can affect learning or reading skills?
The reason I ask is that the latest version of ClaroRead (2.5) and WordRead (next update due soon according to Claro Software) does highlight in MS Word and in Internet Explorer. One of the differences, when compared to TextHelp Read and Write, is that they tend to highlight the space in front of the word as well as after, setting the word centrally in the highlighted area.
Have a good break after CSUN and I am so sorry I missed your talk. Thank you again for your blogs they really are very helpful.
Post a Comment