I've linked these to SpeEdChange posts.
Solution Sunday: (1) Grade level expectations fail all who develop at different rates (almost everyone) Multiage is way to go.Solution Sunday: (2) Subject divisions kill natural learning instincts. All subjects need to be integrated.
Solution Sunday: (3) School time schedules prevent education. Flex time according to student needs.
Solution Sunday: (4) Individualized Education for all. All Students are gifted, all have special needs.
Solution Sunday: (5) All students need to start learning contemporary technology from the start. Especially those from less rich communities.
Solution Sunday: (6) Treat your students equitably and bullying will drop. It's a fact - schools encourage bullying through of adult actions.
Solution Sunday: (7) Text-To-Speech systems help all readers, should be in use right from the start (build sightword recognition, teach the value of what reading offers by providing access to content).
Solution Sunday: (8) Teacher training needs to change. Probably via interning in University Lab Schools. Learning better ways, not old ways. (and unlearning the systems of social reproduction)
Solution Sunday: (9) As long as there are high-stakes Standardized Tests, differentiated instruction is a fraud.
Solution Sunday: (10) More learning opportunities, less explicit instruction before age 8. Don't make young kids hate books and math. Stay flexible and tolerant, and natural curiousity will lead to learning.
- Ira Socol
Great ideas, Ira. I don't think #10 should stop at age 8. Think it applies to much older students, especially middle schoolers (think Chip Wood's idea of middle school in Yardsticks).
ReplyDeleteThis is a fantastic list of ideas that would truly change schools. One more I have been considering as I read Andy Hargreaves: The Fourth Way. He explains that nostalgia for the past, valuing of standardized test scores, and resistance to change comes out of 'anxiety without information'. He advocates building richer relationships through informed public engagement in order to increase involvement and understanding in the community as a way to decrease the perceived need for test scores to measure education. I think this would make a good addition to your list.
ReplyDeleteLisa -
ReplyDeleteYes, you are right. I was being way too conservative here. But I guess hoped to at least get people to stop forcing kids to hate books right at the start. What you're saying is more meaningful, however.
astrang,
A great addition. We have to change the narratives surrounding education. End that nostalgia for a non-existent past (when about 20% of kids succeeded), and bring people with us.
- Ira Socol
I believe #4 is paramount. All learners are indeed gifted, and all learners really do have special needs. Dave Edyburn is so right when he says that we must stop reserving assistive technology for the "privileged" few who "qualify". Each individual has a unique set of learning needs and ought to have access to the learning tools that he or she needs.
ReplyDeleteYes, Paul, that's absolutely essential, along with understanding how everything which surrounds our students is a "tool" - and every tool enables some and disables others.
ReplyDeleteOnly via choice do we get education for all.
- Ira Socol
Hi, Your blog post is informative enough and may be useful to students. There is also a helpful resource http://www.sharetermpapers.com for Managements Students which give me a lot of help like (upload/download) our academic projects, ebooks, case studies and has a database of good projects. This website also have popular ebooks and also study material for exams like CFA, FRM, PRM.....do check it out....
ReplyDeletewww.ShareTermPapers.com
I'm very impressed by your knowledge. I feel like I have a lot to learn from you. Thanks for everything that you share.
ReplyDelete