tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19457872.post7460604963888719270..comments2024-03-26T23:57:42.268-04:00Comments on SpeEdChange: Mad Men, Life on Mars, and Dickens for this Centuryirasocolhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01412837280249622430noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19457872.post-23440597155240134942010-09-13T13:37:50.487-04:002010-09-13T13:37:50.487-04:00Love it. (not a lit teacher, but love it). I find...Love it. (not a lit teacher, but love it). I find similarities to the work I do in "nature of science" in which we try to help students understand the discipline. That is, how scientists work rather than just the "facts" of science. I use many historical examples to illustrate how science changes. When we simply teach science as a rhetoric of conclusions, we don't teach science as a process. Your post helps me see how literature is a process. Great!Jerrid Krusehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04195634850530143328noreply@blogger.com